מה מייאש באקדמיה

Reviewer 1: A lot of the claims on () have been published extensively by other authors before
Reviewer 3: Almost nothing is known about () and little work has been done on ()

Reviewer 1: Some of the methods would not make extensive additional contributions to our knowledge of ()
Reviewer 3: The integrative combination of techniques here has the potential to add considerably to knowledge of ()

Reviewer 4: I didn't quite understand the rationale behind the use of xxx
Reviewer 1: I was disappointed to see that the use of xxx, which is innovative in this context was not brought forth

Reviewer 3: I like that limitations were acknowledged and that a plan was included for such results.
Reviewer 1: There was plenty of room for the authors to expand on the potential pitfalls

Reviewer 1: Overall, a good proposal with ample preliminary data.
Reviewer 2: The system, the methods and the team are all sound.
Reviewer 3: This proposal has an exciting combination of integrative studies to identify () and I find the combination of () particularly exciting and powerful here.
Reviewer 4: I highly recommend funding this proposal. The plan is exceptionally clear, well-organized, and well-motivated.

Final decision?  Not funded